Imagine graduating high school and not being able to attend college afterward due to the amount of income received. Think of how it could affect the United States as a whole and California in particular. The majority of the United States population consists of middle class and minorities. How can this problem be addressed? The president needs to take action. He should take steps into further developing the middle class by working alongside them. The number of opportunities that would open up and would allow for easier access to education. If the federal government were to offer community college for up to two years for free it would reduce social issues across the United States and in California. With granting two years of community college it would prevent the minorities from commiting crimes to make money. Two years of free community college could also assist the economy with granting graduates high level jobs. First and foremost, in the United States particularly in California a notably large amount of institutions known as community colleges are working to provide middle-class college students up to two years of free education. Community colleges are doing something that those with authority should be pushing and making possible but are not. According to the American Association of All Community Colleges, it has reported that “community colleges remain by far the most affordable sector of higher education.” Community colleges on average have a full-time yearly tuition and fees of approximately $3,435 and enroll more than 7.3 million students each year which is nearly 45% of all U.S. college undergraduates. In addition to this, at least five million college students take non-credit classes that happen to involve workforce-oriented programs which help build and progress job skills and qualities. (Deruy, 2017) The American Association of All Community Colleges also reports that the average student age is twenty-eight. In California, before going to a state or university, college students are looking to attend community college in order to complete there general education classes and their Association Transfer Degree but also the reason why most students like myself prefer to attend community college first is because they know dude to there high school grades they won’t be accepted to a good university that’s why they go to community college to obtain better grades and a better GPA. Students spend more than $3,800 each year on college classes and materials alone. The grief of paying for community college can leave students feeling emotional, mentally exhausted, and financially stressed. Free community college for up to two years would ease students struggles and pain and can prevent students from being stressed and going into depression. The idea of getting two years of free community college is doubtful to see it come to reality in today’s political surroundings being at odds but is normally in the bulletins as a conflict of interest between the two important candidates for the Representative nominee for head of state. Bernie Sanders disapproves of helping with tuition and costs of community colleges, while Hillary Clinton is in favor of the rise in student relief targeted at low and middle-class students. The non-tuition costs of attending college, including living expenses, are higher than the expenses of tuition and dues for most students. According to Community College Agenda “Open college, which does not report these expenditures, leaves families from the lower half of the revenue flow with nearly 18 billion dollars in yearly out-of-pocket college budgets that would not be covered by standing national, public, and recognized funding plans. Dedicating new expenses to excluding tuition for all students implicates an agreement with benefitting from the same assets in directed funding utility that would cover overall expenditures of attendance for students from less prosperous families”. (Community College Agenda) As a Californian college student, I think funding community college for up to two years to all residents will increase enrollments across the country and encourage people to pursue a higher education and to follow the career path of their choosing. Residents would feel more inspired and persuaded to take advantage of the opportunity of free college. Former President of the United States Barack Obama stated in one of his speeches that “what he would do is to attend the primary two years of public college free for everyone who is agreeable to do effort for it,” in doing so he planned federal funding for community colleges. Offering funding for community colleges could aid in producing quality workers and innovate students minds who are willing to expand and think vastly. In an article providing details of Obama’s free public college plan, Christi Parsons claims, “the U.S. would spend up to 75% while the states would pay 25$ and that the public college scheme inspires one of Obama’s much loved subjects: enabling the middle class through education and prospect. He realizes the downfall in state finance for advanced education as a main hindrance to those seeking to the middle class community.” (Obama plan for free community college) Although I am not choosing sides, I do believe Barack Obama’s proposal is the right decision for the United States and California in order to progress the quality of education to move the country forward and to create a more higher standard for the future of our country. There is almost a counter argument everywhere, opponents tried to disprove this funding by arguing that this may not be affordable for the state. The government may fall into debt. This may increase the chances of corruption and funds will be used only for college administration not for the students. To allow the fund to happen the government will have to increase taxes on other duties and products, which will be bad for the state’s economy as well as for its people. I agreed that it will increase the taxis, increase the economic burden on the state and will slow down the investment process to the other colleges in the states. I will take the saying from an article Funding 2 years of college is a small price to pay to get educated workers where Gene D Block says, “Everyone can constantly catch a motive to interruption. Nonetheless, it was throughout a death-defying time than the Civil War that President Lincoln saw the significance of founding land-grant colleges. In a reaction to the variations shaped by the Industrial Revolution, he authorized the Morrill Act.” (www.usnews.com) Whatever the case is education is vital to accomplishing for each individual in the world. Even if there is enough burden on the government, it will be returned in the near future when students leave community colleges with degrees and start working in the career they choose. For the people that hire these students, this will economically groom California and the American people. Look at it this way when the middle-class people and minorities get equal rights in education, they will make themselves good and loyal citizen of their country and this will prevent crimes from happening.There are two sides to every coin, so Obama’s plan may have its advantages and disadvantages. While tuition isn’t free now, roughly forty percent of all U.S. college students pick to register to community colleges, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. (Santa Rosa Press Democrat, 2017) Struggles to expand Americans schooling and talents should aim people who otherwise wouldn’t or couldn’t finish college, such as those who are employed more than half the time to cover their expenses. If public college becomes tuition-free regardless of salaries, many middle-class and higher students may register to avoid tuition for two years before moving to a four-year college, probably packed out misfortunate students. That is why any tuition cutbacks should be means-tested to mark those students for whom affordability is a hurdle to success. “If free communal college encourages more students to pursue and complete training in skills and grades in high-directive among administrators, then there is a net profit to the student in future incomes and to the general public in upper gross native produce as the stock of human assets patches related to other countries.” (Stanley 2003). But if students select training in trades or degrees that they may fail to finish or that are not likely to lead to a better job successive to the finishing point, then they have basically added to the public expenses without profiting themselves or the economy. They would be better off attaining practice and incomes in any job than in wasting time on a nonproductive degree. Without a doubt, the latest contract supported financially by the American Association of Community Colleges stated “that public colleges need to do more to aid students plan their educational purposes; scale back boutique options; cooperate more with industry and business to form set of courses, deposit-required lineups and gear, and offer positions and employments; and to work more thoroughly with high schools and 4 year colleges to promote learning and updated evolutions.” (The Community College: Values, Vision & Vitality) Making public college free, will decrease expenses for families but increase them, possibly for taxpayers. At first, there’s the limited amount of costs currently covered by tuition that would be moved to taxpayers. Additionally, free tuition would grow the whole registration and scope of public colleges relative to today. Basically, people consume more of pretty much anything when the rate to them is compressed. Although providing funding for free community college for up to two years for all residents can be a huge step for the government, it can do more good than harm. Students will no longer have to feel overwhelmed by how they will get through college. They will feel more willing to take advantage of free higher education. Middle-class families and minorities are barely getting by even now. Making community college free will create and solve fewer problems. The government investing in college students will contribute greatly to the rest of the community and economy as a whole. Two years of community college is something the government should consider as it can impact the United States and individual states futures.As a California College Student, born in Los Angeles I may or may not agree with the Obama Education plan. But I believe that college education should be free. Many people out there discontinue education after high school just for the reason that they don’t have the resources and money to continue their education. Most of these people go to doing crimes and end up in jail or prison if we were to grant two years of free community college this could be prevented. The people that surround the society that I live in doesn’t know more than the basic knowledge. How unfair is that? I do not approve with this question because we all have the right to have advanced education. I feel as though that is just wrong how most people just basic knowledge because they can’t attend a higher education due to their income. It wouldn’t remove social discrimination when people pay to care about gender and character. Then it would depend on the work you get but what if you actually couldn’t go to college. “Wouldn’t that make you seem even inferior and put you in a bottomless trench when it comes to a social discrimination?” (Behrman, Robert, and Paul, 1989) Free college education would offer an increase of value for the economy if you’re talking about more people being capable of coming into the playing field with advanced degrees so they can utilize that to drive our society but in all sense of right and wrong, it all comes down to value and moral belief. With the way things are now, so many of us who went to college even those who graduated from universities don’t have jobs. Would a free college education alter things like this? Perhaps not. “When word gets out to other nations that we offer a free college education, wouldn’t people start pouring in? I mean, better than compensating over thousands bucks at the colleges near their households. It is type of impractical no matter how exceptional this sounds”. (Johnson, 2006) I think it’s an astonishing notion, the workings that this would do is endless, and it would be extremely useful to everybody else but how is the administration arranging to pay for this if it permits? Taxes? That appears a bit suspicious. If they say that they’re predicting on doing this themselves, I wouldn’t be certain if they had the strong point or resources to. On top of that, would this actually alter things in the long run? If you didn’t have to pay for a college education which is just about essential to obtain a particular occupation, many more students would be joining. I definitely feel in order for students to obtain a degree and for them to be able to get two years of free community college they would have to pull some money out of taxpayers in order to somehow this happen. I know for a fact if they were to so this could impact the economy strong but if you look at it on the bright side more people will be able to get higher education. As a final point, I still feel as though the federal government should fund two years of community college. College is to prestiges for a lot of people which would enforce them to take out student loans which will only stack up as the years goes by. According to Bragg “In Europe, many nations offer free college education because they see the youth’s determination for education as an advantage for their state, not just a way to generate a lot of revenue. Also by not having to pay for college, some students who are intellectually adequate but not monetarily would still be able to get into significant schools”. (Bragg, 2001). Those who have battled for school choice, should distinguish free public college for what it indeed is, and in its place, push for improvements that increase preferences and choice not decrease them and by granting two years of free education could help improve our economy could help the minorities grow as humans and be able to obtain great jobs to better themselves rather than commit crimes.