References norms. International Organization, 6, 593-625. Ebenezer, L.


Alemika, E. O.,
& Omotosho, S. B. (2008). Nigeria’s 2007 general elections: Betrayal of
electorate optimism and participation. Abuja: Alliance for Credible
Elections and CLEEN Foundation.

Azinge, E. (2012,
September). Forward. In Dr. Felix Okoye Memorial Lecture Series. Abuja:
Nigerian Institute of Advanced Legal Studies (NIALS) Press.

Birch, S. (2008).
Electoral malpractice and electoral manipulation in new and semi-democracies.
Retrieved from

Bork, R.H. (2002).
Coercing virtue: The worldwide rule of judges. Toronto: Vintage Canada.

Bratton, M.
(2004). The alternation effect in Africa. Journal of Democracy, 15(4),

Bratton, M.
(2008). Vote buying and violence in Nigerian election campaigns. Electoral
Studies, 27, 621-632.

Brooks, H. (2014,
October). The dominant party system: Challenge for South Africa’s second decade
of democracy. Elections and democratic governance in Africa (EISA), Occasional
Paper Number 25.

Calingaert, D.
(2006). Election rigging and how to fight It. Journal of Democracy, 17(3),

Canon, B. C.
(1982). A framework for the analysis of judicial activism. In Stephen C.
Halpem and Charles M. Lamb (Eds.), Supreme Court activism and restraint, (pp.

Carothers, T.
(1997). The observers observed. Journal of Democracy, 8(3), 17–31.

Dahl, R. (1971). Polyarchy.
New Haven: Yale University Press.

Diamond, L., &
Morlino, L. (2004). The quality of democracy: An overview. Journal of
Democracy 15(4), 20-31.

Donno, D. (2010).
Who Is punished? Regional intergovernmental organizations and the enforcement
of democratic norms. International Organization, 6, 593-625.

Ebenezer, L. E.
(2014). A synoptic analysis of issues in Nigerian presidential elections
disputes 1999 – 2007. Historical Research Letter 13, 22-28.

Eisenstadt, T.A.
(2004). Courting democracy in Mexico: Party strategies and electoral
institutions. Cambridge; NY: Cambridge University Press.

Elklit, J., &
Reynolds, A. (2005a). A framework for the systematic study of election quality.
Democratization, 12(2), 147-162. Journal of Politics and
Democratization Volume 2-1 (April 2017)


J., & Reynolds, A. (2005b). Judging elections and election management
quality by process. Representation, 41(3), 189-207.

J., & Svensson, P. 1997. What Makes Elections Free and Fair? Journal of
Democracy, 8(3), 32-46.

R. L. (2008). Emerging judicial power in transitional democracies: Malawi,
Tanzania and Uganda (Doctoral Dissertation). Public and International
Affairs Dissertations. Paper 3. Retrieved from

J. H. (1980). Democracy and distrust. Cambridge: Harvard University

Union Election Observation Mission (EU EOM). (2003). Nigeria: National
assembly elections, presidential and gubernatorial elections, state houses of
assembly elections, 2003, Final Report. European Union Election Observation
Mission, Nigeria.

EOM. (2007). Final Report on April 2007 elections: Nigeria. European
Union Election Observation Mission, Nigeria.

in the World. (2010). Erosion of freedom intensifies. Retrieved from

T. (2003). Judicial review in new democracies: Constitutional courts in
Asian cases. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

H. (2002). How political parties can use the courts to advance their agendas:
Federal courts in the United States, 1875-1891. American Political Science
Review, 96, 511-524.

S. (2004). How to assess the political role of the Zambian courts. Michelsen
Institute. Development Studies and Human Rights Bergen, Norway.

J., McCoy, J. & Mustillo, T. M. (2008). Electoral governance matters:
Explaining the quality of elections in contemporary Latin America. Comparative
Political Studies, 41(1), 73-98.

V. A. (2015). Disputed elections in presidential democracies: Challenging
electoral outcomes as a negotiation strategy. Working Papers Series 2015-4(12). International IDEA.

R. (2006). The new constitutionalism and the judicialization of pure politics
worldwide. 75 Fordham Law Review.

S P. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century.
Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.

National Electoral Commission (INEC). (2011). Report on the 2011 general