School or preventing these ideas is something that

School shootings, killings, suicides, murders. What do these all have in common? Guns. Gun control is a major piece in massacres all over the world. The idea of limiting or preventing these ideas is something that has been talked about for years. With guns available, harm could potentially come with them around, while if you take them away people can become vulnerable to threats. Should the government limit all guns to the population? Or should they give more out? Most people have no prior knowledge or facts on what gun control is all about. The issue of gun control is whether limiting them would be effective for the better of the population. Effectiveness can be a variety of ideas depending on the person. One may think it can simply be ending guns to help the population, but they are wrong. The only true effective way to better the the population of our nation is to implement a gun control free program. Online according to Vox, if gun population were to increase there is a potential for the homicide rate to convey a significant upwards trend. As Vox’s survey backs this up, they did a study to show the difference between the United States and Canada’s firearms. There are 6 times as many owned in the U.S. As astounding as this fact is, rates do not necessarily correlate. More violence has been used in the U.S. with guns from the availability of them, however there are still many different ways that someone is able to kill another human being via knife, rope, various household items, bare hands, etc (Vox). The ability to defend against oneself is a very important aspect, while it is another reason for Americans to own so many guns. Looking back a few years ago to the Sandy Hook shooting, CNN describes the situation on what happened that day. A gunman by the name of Adam Lanza shoots 20 children along with 6 adults. It was a complete mess that could have possibly been prevented. If these adults were to all have had firearms/protection on them, they could have brought down the perpetrator earlier saving innocent citizens lives (CNN). In another instance, the Columbine shooting was one of the worst shootings to happen on U.S. soil. If this were to happen but teachers all had a spare gun in the corner of there rooms, I believe the situation would have turned out differently with a lot of lives saved. Teachers should be allowed to have guns for students and staff protection, as long as it is locked and stored out of sight. People of communities get scared at the sight of guns, but it is far better to have the feeling of knowing it’s there to keep you safe, rather than without protection allowing vulnerability.As events from the past happen, it can change the future for the better and for the worse. In Federalist Paper #46 there is talk by James Madison about the second Amendment, the right to bear arms. Even as far back as the constitution, the right to bear arms has been a big part of society. According to an article by The Week, James Madison changed America’s gun problem. In writing by the man himself stated,”A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This is the base of where America’s gun control issue has stemmed from (The Week). The federal government has to realize gun control is wrong and that if it were to happen causing firearms to be withdrawn, it would only hurt the United States more. Remember back in 1976 when the precious federal government banned firearms in Washington D.C.? Guns were banned to only the police officers, while if you already had guns that you owned they had to be disassembled or trigger locked. Only police could remove these in very rare situations. The results from this event were shocking and not like anybody would have expected. Homicides increased from 188 in 1976, to 364 in 1988, while in 1993 the rate still kept rising to 454. The Supreme Court Case in District of Columbia v. Hellar eventually shut this act down from the heinous progressions. Back in 2012, the murder rates went down to 88. Even though there are always other factors that contribute to homicides, my point of lifting gun bans clearly was not the answer then, and it still is clearly not the answer now (DailyWire). Although this aspect of murder rates going down, there is still always that chance of people killing themselves due to the opportunity to gain access to firearms (Lopez). Within this fact, would you want guns to be more available to suicidal people when it is the quickest way out? It is providing less time for people to react as if someone were to hang or cut themselves, there is more time to save them (CNN). Wall Street Journal’s change the aspects of knowledge as they incorporate current events. Wall Street Journal refers to the current, past, and present events. Providing knowledge to me through these journals helped me realize that these events affect me directly, and that I need to pay attention to politics so I can have a say in what the future of our government will turn out to be. For example, the Las Vegas shooting by Stephen Paddock killing 58 people makes people question gun control. People hate to see events like this happen, resulting in citizens wanting to make change in laws to prevent this from happening.  While having guns available could have stopped the perpetrator, kids could have accidently gained access to gun areas and misuse authority. As far as the background for gun control goes, there are also pros and cons to limiting and/or increasing guns. According to a survey by ProCon, there is the idea that more guns reduce deaths. In fact, there were 464,033 deaths involving the use of guns between 1999 and 2013 while 270,237 of these were suicides (ProCon). Providing that guns are the easiest route of suicide, could reducing guns prevent suicides? Or would it increase or maybe not even change a thing? Another survey by ProCon indicates that gun control laws do not deter crime, as gun ownership does. In November of 2013 it was found that between 1980 and 2009 assault weapons ban did make much of an impact on murder rates. ProCon also states that high capacity magazines should be banned in order to put a damper on mass shootings. Between the years of 1982 and 2012, guns used in mass shootings were involved in at least 50% of the 62 mass shootings recorded. The death rate rose 63% and the injury rate increased by a staggering 156% (ProCon). With these shocking statistics, one must not forget that just because there is the ability to take away guns, it does not mean that guns will be eliminated from the public. Criminals will still find a way to get to them, as they have done with illegal substances and drugs. ProCon says once a shooting starts, it lets the shooter fire off more shots faster which harms more people quicker. There is no need for the population in general to have that firepower available to them; David H. Chipman: Vice President, Public Safety, former ATF Agent (ProCon). As this proves gun control may not be the best option, there are still a variety of sources that have quality information on why they believe gun control is the best option. ProCon suggests that with the availability of guns, the likeliness of mass shootings will increase. Research was done by Daily Wire that says that the majority of shootings occur in gun free zones. Within their research, The Crime Research Prevention Center determined that since 1950 nearly 99 percent of mass public shootings have occurred in gun-free zones. Murderers and gunmen are always looking for the prime spot to wipe out the most people or inflict the maximum damage possible. So why would they not choose gun free zones? The federal government has approximately 628,000 police officers, while the U.S. has a striking 320 million people (Bandler). United States Citizens must have the right to own firearms, as the federal government isn’t able to protect everybody. As The Huffington Post describes, there is another side to this. If americans didn’t own guns, people who have less access to them possibly decreasing the rate of deaths with less access and availability for the public to get their hands on (Mclaughlin). Picture a world where all guns are illegal to own. No protection, no safety, no place to go, all thanks to gun control. Criminals have opportunities to ambush whenever they want. According to a study by Daily Wire, the correlation between higher firearm gun ownership has actually reduced police killings. In the specific six states that have banned firearm carry between the years of 2013 and 2015 experienced rates upwards of 18 more policemen deaths. It really is no surprise that the 86.4% of the 20,000 sheriffs and police chiefs surveyed were against gun control and would rather have firearms on citizens (Bandler). “Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.” This is a quote by James Madison in Federalist Paper #46, showing how even centuries ago people have the power of having and owning firearms. Madison provides a representation of being prominent over other governments through power in the people.With all of the information I have provided, I have an opinion myself. I believe that Gun Control would help America in an array of aspects. If guns were to be given to people at more local places like markets and stores, I would be all for that. As The Huffington Post describes, people need to intimidate potential shooters and be ready for when the next massacre happens (Mclaughlin). As I believe this, I think that it would be best to limit what guns are available to people. Guns that have a high rate of fire/assault rifles, shouldn’t be available to the public. There is no need to have them just for the fun of it when this could limit mass shootings. People should be allowed to purchase guns to hunt and protect themselves, but only when given background checks. If someone has any history at all of criminal behavior on record, they should not be allowed to purchase and use weapons. With this in mind, I believe this would be a great idea for the United States to put into action. I believe this would benefit the United States greatly causing decreased murder, mass shootings, and massacres. Terrorists are not the only ones to blame for these horrific events that happen on U.S. soil; it’s our very own federal government. Throughout my disquisition, I have showed and represented ideas, explained and described stats on past gun control issues and statistics, and explained policies the federal government should enforce. I believe the government must make change in order to keep the maximum amount of people alive, well, and thriving in our great nation, The United States of America.