The it it settled by what kind of

The compatibilist makes a similar claim about free will. It is often a problem that one may misunderstand the true concept of freedom through the idea which determinism exists. For example, when one was kidnaped and forced to commit murders, their actions were not free because they were caused in the wrong way. Free actions, such as having Fruit Loops, have causes but they are caused in the right way. Every action has a cause but having a cause does not settle whether it is free or not. Whether it is free it it settled by what kind of cause it has. If free actions are caused in the right way, as the statement says, then an action can be both caused and free . When compatibilist say that free actions must be caused ‘in the right way’, what exactly is the right way? Suppose this; ‘a free action is one that is caused by the person’s beliefs and desires’. For example, when kidnaped, one’s beliefs and desires did not cause them to shoot the first victim or to fall from the airplane. they did not want to do these things. In fact their actions were caused by the beliefs and desires of the kidnaper. This proposes that one’s behavior in those cases as not considered free. Likewise, since one’s beliefs and desires caused them to write a paper and others caused them to read it, these actions are also free, according to the definition. Supposing this; ‘a free action is one that is caused by the person’s beliefs and desires, provided that those beliefs and desires flow from ‘who the person is’. One’s desires for example, under hypnosis do not flow from ‘who you are’ as it does not match the desires one usually has; they are uncharacteristic. Nevertheless, many perfectly ordinary free actions are caused by uncharacteristic desires. For example, though one may be generally a nice person, a couple of times they have snapped at someone. Despite being uncharacteristic for them, their snapping was definitely a free action. There are two ways of decision making and who one is. First, someone permanently brainwashes somebody into becoming a terrible person. The brainwashing is thorough that for the rest of one’s life , all they wish to do is hurt people. At first, one’s actions may seem out of character. Yet, soon everybody forget the good qualities and senn as truly a bad person. Are the subsequent actions free? However, the second way, one undergo moral transformation. After recognizing that their life was terrible, they wanted to change the “who they are”, perhaps with the help of therapists. Unlike brainwashing, moral transformation does not destroy free will, but in each case, one acts in accordance with the ‘who they are’, which was changed through other people’s influences. As one matures they shape themselves and even after reaching adulthood they continue to reflect on themselves to meet their ideals. Beliefs and desires must flow from who the person means that the beliefs and desires must be ‘in character’ for that person, as they must fit the character, moral beliefs and habits that the person has shaped for themselves over time. However, if ‘free’ does not mean ‘uncaused’, what does it mean? Compatibilist try to show the idea that a free action is one that is caused in the right way, but not only just in the right way, in every way there will be a cause one way or another.